Caviar, that was the term that in recent years has used the Fujimori and other sectors of the conservative right to disqualify military position and political discourse Peruvian left refers to the rights human, the punishment of violators of the same and the need to strengthen democratic institutions. For example, once known the outcome of the process that was under Alberto Fujimori, for the cases of La Cantuta, Barrios Altos and the kidnapping of Samuel Dyer and Gustavo Gorriti, a process in which he was sentenced to 25 years of deprivation of freedom, the youngest of Fujimori, Kenyi, Congressman-elect at this time, said very clearly that the great political battle to free his father would be on the streets between his group and the sectors they called caviar.
also in due course, his sister, Keiko Fujimori, presidential candidate also blamed caviar, ie all movements and civil society groups involved in defending human rights, such as the National Coordinator for Human Rights, the criminal proceeding brought against his father , a process which branded the unjust and inhuman, conducted by judges all they had in mind was to unleash a tremendous legal proceedings against the dictator and against anyone who dared to defend it.
Rarely in recent years had witnessed a political speech as confrontational and violent as that used in referring to Fujimori these sectors, and individuals such as lawyers Ronald Gamarra, Carlos Rivera and Gloria Cano, who participated in the process as advocates for the civil, that is, lawyers for the victims of Barrios Altos and Cantuta. Also, that same anger and virulence was shown in previous years because of the submission of the Final Report of the Commission of Truth and Reconciliation, which was branded slander and defamatory pamphlet against the Fujimori regime, the same who had sole intended to derail the progress that the dictator had achieved security and combating terrorism, even to the honorable people tick, as are the commissioners, advocates of the subversive, in short called "pro terrucos."
Later, in the sadly remembered episode in which hordes of Fujimori, with the acquiescence or silence of its leaders, attacked the memory and the memory of the families of the victims of internal war orange paint covering the monument of the weeping eye, then-Congresswoman Keiko Fujimori, sought to make public their opposition to such an act of vandalism with the use of language rather patronizing to those responsible for such acts. At that time, both Keiko as the staff of Force 2011, tried to explain the feeling indignation that the Fujimori led the condemnation of his father and the construction of monuments such as this in which it pays tribute to dead people, rather killed, as was the case of a young student of Cantuta, Enrique Ortiz Perea, and many others like him who were summarily executed by the government of Alberto Fujimori, to which the Fujimori regime, in the person of Martha Chavez insists qualify as terrorists. That is, for Fujimori, for Mrs. Chavez, Alberto Fujimori, despite having been convicted under a process in which we were respected all the judicial guarantees is innocent, but Mr. Ortiz Perea, who is the killed after being kidnapped, is guilty of terrorism, without further proof that the decision of the Colina group members in that year operating under the guidance and direction of Alberto Fujimori and Vladimiro Montesinos.
After it came time to argue and establish position on the initiative of the Peruvian State, thanks to the contribution and German cooperation to build a Museum of Memory, which allows the company to keep in mind occurred during the years of political violence experienced in our country for two decades, eager not to repeat in future mistakes that allowed the emergence and consolidation of a subversive movement as bloodthirsty as Sendero Luminoso, but also end the state indifference then displayed with the most vulnerable and to prevent the State from re-committing systematic crimes against humanity. As expected, the Fujimori, Keiko Fujimori in the lead, once again showed their disagreement with this initiative, arguing that the war even culminated not that the museum claims equally to victims and perpetrators, which is undoubtedly false, and to affirm, as the Commission of Truth, that the Peruvian state in various parts of the country, sparked a policy of systematic violation of Human Rights, was not but a hoax on the left used to discredit the institutions like the armed forces and police during that time were in charge of operational control of the fight against terror.
Finally, last year, the fujimorsimo, along with representatives from other political sectors, as the then Defence Minister, and current vice presidential candidate by the hand of Keiko Fujimori, Rafael Rey, announced their support questioned the promulgation of Legislative Decree 1097. For those who do not remember the reason this controversy should know that this statement meant the archiving (dismissal in legal language) of the processes which it was exceeded within the period of investigation or criminal investigation (14 months). Ie, that provision gives the judge the power to terminate the proceedings against soldiers and police officers accused of committing human rights crimes such as murder, kidnapping, forced disappearance, rape and torture by the mere fact of having been beaten within the investigation phase. In other words, the provision under review was intended to prevent, or at least hinder or obstruct the prosecution and punishment of persons responsible for crimes as heinous as those described above. As we all know, after the resignation of Mario Vargas Llosa the Chairman of the Memorial Museum, due to the promulgation of this decree, which labeled only disguised amnesty law, the government had to take a step back and opt for the repeal of the legal device, which led to the Rafael Rey resignation to the Ministry of Defence, the resignation of Justice Minister, Víctor García Toma and the negative reaction of Fujimori, who through parliament as Rolando Sousa, had been one of the few voices that did not reject, as if society did civil and the elite of the national legal community, the enforcement of that rule.
These being the background of Fujimori and Keiko Fujimori, is at best contradictory, if not electorally desirable, which in recent days, the candidate has made his speech so often branded as caviar, left or pro terrucos. In this past week we have listened to apologize for the crimes committed by his father or his government, which for me are the same, yet he insists on seeing his father and his government as the best of recent times, she says that was the best Republican national life, it is inconsistent, and he knows that now lie electioneering Mrs. Keiko endorse the Final Report of the Truth Commission, and commit even to pursue any and all each of the recommendations put forward by the commissioners there, after having criticized and accused of subversive pro document this work. It is also contradictory and not credible, his new quest to build the Museum of Memory or endorsement of the monument Crying Eye, also cast doubt on statements which agree not to pardon his father convicted rapist human rights and not to favor release or military or police prosecuted for crimes against humanity.
These are the contradictions that seem to have noticed the media, or better yet do not seem to want to warn. The program is plagued candidate Ollanta Humala inconsistencies and contradictions, and incomplete proposals impractical, but again, as it did in an earlier opportunity, presents a programmatic proposal, however, in Human Rights and Democracy, the program Keiko Fujimori, is completely silent The chapter on human rights, there is not important for Fujimori. It is therefore surprising that suddenly Keiko Fujimori intends to turn left speech since a leftist, communist red and branded him to anyone who dared to question the government of his father for committing these crimes, and intends to show as a kind of embodiment of the noblest of the doctrine and movement in defense of human rights.
I wonder if that was its original intention, if it has always believed in these values \u200b\u200band principles, because his attitude and his words and statements in recent years are against this road, why should condemns coup 5 April 1992 Cantuta crimes or uptown reelection for a third term of his father in 2000, carries a Yoshiyama, defender of April 5 and all the political persecution against opponents of the regime why take Martha Chavez, a champion of the Colina Group, who was one of the main propulsion of the amnesty laws enacted in for these criminals, why bring and insist on people like Rafael Rey, the renowned authoritarian and conservative political positions, creator of the 1097 decree by which it was intended to benefit military human rights abusers, enemy of the defense-related organizations human rights, who was branded a lie caviar Report of the Commission of Truth. For these reasons is that personally I can not believe in the word of Keiko Fujimori to talk about human rights and democracy. Why should we believe him when he says he does not pardon his father, perhaps the Fujimori regime has been characterized by its respect for the law, because to believe that military and police benefit involved in killings and massacres, perhaps the Fujimori has taken over the provisions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which prohibits the pardon and grace rights in favor of these criminals, how to believe a person who keeps calling democratic government one in which the theft, corruption and violation of human rights were part of everyday life, how to believe a person who participated enthusiastically in the campaign for the third term of his father, knowing that this was unconstitutional, and that Three judges have been ousted for opposing the size assault on democratic institutions and the rule of law. Allow me to doubt, or any case, to say clearly: I do not believe Keiko Fujimori.
0 comments:
Post a Comment